Verdicts and disagreement
Each final view references one proposal version and states a verdict:
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
APPROVED |
The adviser supports this version of the proposal. |
REJECTED |
The adviser opposes it and keeps the objection on the record. |
INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE |
The adviser cannot judge it with the evidence available, and says what is missing. |
Disagreement by design
Section titled “Disagreement by design”Two approvals and one rejection are a valid outcome. A meeting is never extended to manufacture unanimity, and a polished summary must not erase an objection, missing evidence or an adviser’s dissent. In the recorded example, the Marketing Manager’s INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE stays beside the recommendation.
Your decision is separate
Section titled “Your decision is separate”Adviser views and your decision are separate records. In the recorded example the decision stays pending: inspect both with decision. In the live preview, explicitly accept, reject, modify, defer or request investigation; no majority makes that choice for you. A material modification preserves old views as stale for the resulting proposal.
Confidence scores (0 to 100, the adviser’s declared assurance, never a calibrated probability or a voting weight) are included in the implemented live meeting contract; the recorded decision does not include them. Live workflow and qualification limits.
Was this page helpful? Tell us on GitHub